Analyse your application against the official evaluation criteria, fix what matters most and assess your proposal from an evaluator's perspective.
Evalora helps NGOs, consultants, universities and public institutions analyse their application against the funding call criteria, identify compliance gaps and missing requirements, apply prioritised improvements and simulate an evaluator's assessment before the final submission.
The application does not clearly address the evaluation criteria — even when the project itself is strong.
Compliance gaps and missing requirements stay invisible until after the application has been submitted.
Teams spend effort improving sections that already work instead of the gaps that actually affect the outcome.
Applicants submit without knowing how an evaluator panel could actually score their application against the official criteria.
Evalora shows you exactly where the gaps are, what to fix, and how to fix them — before you submit your application.
Evalora follows a structured process — extracting the call criteria, analysing the proposal against them, applying targeted improvements, and simulating how an independent evaluator would score it.
Evalora extracts the evaluation criteria with point weights, eligibility rules, budget limits, required documents and deadlines from the official call document.
Upload your current draft — Word — even if it is incomplete or still being revised. Evalora works with what you have.
Get a full breakdown — strengths, compliance issues, missing requirements and clear indicators of what each evaluation criterion still needs.
Work through suggestions ranked by priority and effort level. Each comes with a before-and-after view of what to rewrite and why it matters for that criterion.
Run an evaluator simulation to get a predicted grant score, per-criterion evaluator comments and a list of red flags likely to affect the result.
Go into submission knowing your application has been reviewed against the actual criteria, improved where it mattered, and seen from the evaluator's perspective.
Upload a funding call document and Evalora extracts the key information — eligibility rules, evaluation criteria with point weights, required documents, budget limits and deadlines.
The extracted criteria become the foundation for your proposal analysis and evaluator simulation.Run a full analysis of your proposal against the funding call criteria. See a clear breakdown of strengths, identify compliance issues and missing requirements, and get concrete indicators of what needs attention in each section.
Know what is working, what is missing and what to improve — before the application leaves your desk.Get prioritised recommendations for each evaluation criterion — ranked by priority and effort level — with a before-and-after view of what to rewrite and why it matters for that specific criterion.
Accept, edit or reject each suggestion individually. Applied changes are saved automatically as a new version.Simulate how an independent evaluator panel would score your proposal. Get a predicted grant score, success probability, estimated ranking, per-criterion evaluator comments and a list of red flags likely to draw attention.
Understand the evaluator's perspective before your proposal reaches them.Every analysis run and applied improvement is saved automatically as a version. View your score progression across all revisions and compare any two versions side by side — criterion by criterion — to see exactly what changed and what improved.
Build a clearer picture of what strong applications look like across different funding calls.Grant proposals analysed
From sign-up to first result
Criteria skipped per analysis
From — per proposal: analyse, improve & evaluate
"The project will have a lasting impact on the community."
"After completion, 12 trained local facilitators will continue monthly workshops independently. A 12-month post-project evaluation will track outcomes across all 3 partner organisations."
Evalora identifies which criterion is affected, flags the priority level, and shows exactly what needs to change — with a before/after view for every suggestion.
| Generic ChatGPT | Evalora |
|---|---|
| ✕ Requires detailed prompting | ✓ Upload your funding call and application |
| ✕ Focuses mainly on text generation | ✓ Reviews the complete application |
| ✕ No structured review process | ✓ Follows a structured proposal review process |
| ✕ Generic feedback | ✓ Funding-specific recommendations |
| ✕ No compliance checking | ✓ Criteria compliance analysis per section |
| ✕ No reviewer perspective | ✓ Reviewer-style feedback |
| ✕ You decide what to ask | ✓ Evalora guides the complete review process |
Strengthen proposals even when your team has limited time and capacity.
Review drafts faster and provide more structured support to clients.
Improve research and partnership proposals across different funding programmes.
Develop clearer project applications with stronger logic, impact and compliance.
Improve proposal quality and reduce avoidable weaknesses before submission.
Every plan includes the complete Evalora review process.
Need more capacity?
"Before Evalora we spent weeks working on proposals without knowing whether we were really aligned with the call criteria."
"The evaluator simulation showed us exactly which criteria we were missing — something we would have only discovered after rejection."
"I manage applications for six clients at the same time. Evalora's criteria analysis and improvement priorities let me identify the critical gaps in hours, not days."
"We had proposals rejected for missing compliance requirements we didn't even know about. Since using Evalora, we catch those gaps before they reach the evaluator."
Everything you need to know before you start.
Evalora is a grant proposal quality assurance platform. You upload the official funding call and your draft application — Evalora extracts the evaluation criteria, analyses your proposal against them, generates prioritised improvement suggestions with before/after examples, and simulates how an evaluator panel would score the final application. The goal is to help you identify and fix weaknesses before submission, not after rejection.
No. Evalora does not write or generate proposals. You bring your own draft — even an incomplete one — and Evalora reviews it against the official criteria of the funding call. The result is a structured analysis of what is working, what is missing, and what needs to be improved, with targeted recommendations and examples to show you how you could strengthen your content and wording. This means Evalora helps you improve your proposal while keeping the writing and final decisions entirely in your hands.
The analysis reviews your proposal criterion by criterion, as defined in the funding call. For each criterion you get a breakdown of strengths, identified compliance issues, missing requirements, and concrete indicators of what still needs attention together with generated examples. The output is structured around the actual evaluation criteria — not a generic checklist — so every finding is directly relevant to how your application will be assessed.
The Evaluator Simulation models how an independent evaluator panel would assess your proposal. It generates a predicted grant score, a per-criterion breakdown with evaluator-style comments, and a list of red flags likely to draw negative attention. It is an AI-based simulation — not a guarantee of the actual score received by the real evaluators. Evalora's AI model is trained and guided to think like a grant proposal evaluator, assessing your application against the actual evaluation criteria of the specific funding call. It gives you a clear, structured view of how your application may be perceived by evaluators before it leaves your desk.
Every suggestion is assigned a priority level — High, Medium or Low — and an estimated effort level, so you know where to focus your time. Each suggestion includes a before/after view of the specific text that needs changing and an explanation of why it matters for that evaluation criterion. You can accept, edit or reject each suggestion individually. Applied changes are saved automatically as a new version of your proposal.
Credits are consumed per action: Funding Call Analysis costs 10 credits, Application Analysis costs 20 credits, and Application Evaluation costs 10 credits. A complete review cycle costs 40 credits in total. Credits remain valid for the full validity period of your plan (12 months for paid plans, 30 days for the free trial).
Evalora supports Word (.docx) documents for both the funding call and the proposal. You can upload documents at any stage of completion — Evalora works with whatever draft you have. There is no requirement to use a specific template or structure.
Yes. Every analysis run and every set of applied improvements is saved as a version automatically. The Analysis History feature lets you compare any two versions side by side — criterion by criterion — so you can see exactly what changed, what improved, and how the evaluator score shifted between revisions. This makes the improvement process transparent and measurable.
Yes. The Free Trial plan gives you 70 credits for 30 days with no credit card required. That is enough to run a complete analysis cycle — funding call extraction, proposal analysis and evaluator simulation — on your first application and still have credits remaining for improvement suggestions.
Documents you upload are processed securely and used only to generate your analysis results. They are not shared with third parties. Each account's data is isolated and accessible only to the account holder. For organisations handling sensitive or pre-submission proposal content, confidentiality is treated as a baseline requirement, not an optional feature.
Have a question or a suggestion for improvement? Send us a message and we'll get back to you within 24 hours.
Upload your funding call and draft, understand where you stand, and strengthen the sections that matter most.
Clear feedback for real grant applicants. No credit card required.
86